meehawl

all that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned

3 Responses

  1. Anonymous says:
    2006-12-14 at 10:11:12

    of course I said this years ago, that there were health benefits, but you derided that. The National Institutes of Health even went further and said “it would be unethical not to offer [circumciscion]”. Hmmm, meehawl says circumcision is unethical but the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH says it’s unethical not to. Who should I believe…. hmmm, it’s so hard a decision.

    not

  2. mike says:
    2006-12-14 at 10:11:12

    If you can’t see the moral and ethical difference between a sexually active person with full knowledge of the health benefits, pain and reduced pleasure that will ensue from choosing genital mutilation for themselves (over other available options such as prophylactic barriers or monogamy) versus inflicting this mutilation on a sexually immature infant then I can’t help you.

  3. Anonymous says:
    2006-12-21 at 10:11:12

    oh i thought we can’t judge because everyone’s morals and ethics are relative and so people can do whatever they want and you can’t judge them.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.