{"id":2125,"date":"2005-02-04T21:09:00","date_gmt":"2005-02-05T01:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles-wp\/?p=2125"},"modified":"2005-02-04T21:09:00","modified_gmt":"2005-02-05T01:09:00","slug":"aliens-amongst-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/2005\/02\/04\/21\/09\/aliens-amongst-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Aliens Amongst Us"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was thinking about the biological dogma that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cephalization\">cephalisation<\/a> can only occur<br \/>\nwithin bilaterally symmetric animals (<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bilateria\"><span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Bilateria<\/span><\/a>). It seems to me that a bilateral<br \/>\nsymmetry would put evolutionary pressure on such animals to evolve<br \/>\ncephalization (and hence eyes\/sensors and response cells) because they<br \/>\nare on &#8220;rails&#8221;, but that the evolution of a rapid, focussed<br \/>\nstimulus-response within a radially symmetric animal would be less<br \/>\nlikely, but would still happen, given enough time and stimulus. Therefore *more* bilateria should exhibit cephalisation and developed brains (and in fact that is overwhelmingly true!) but that development of complex environmental processing adaptations analogous to brains could still evolve within <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Radiata\"><span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Radiata<\/span><\/a>. Of course, the proportion of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cnidaria\/C_sivickisi.html\">radially symmetric<\/a> animals that develop advanced mentation will be less than bilaterally symmetric animals, but it&#8217;s still happen. Maybe there *are* massive <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&#038;q=clarke+meeting.with.medusa&#038;btnG=Google+Search\">intelligent medusae on Jupiter<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>Then I found the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cnidaria\/cubozoa.html\">box jellies<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cubozoa\"><span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Cubozoa<\/span><\/a>. These things are cool. They are a class of &#8220;hunting&#8221; <span style=\"font-style:italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cnidaria\">Cnidaria<\/a><\/span> (jellyfish!) that have evolved <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mhhe.com\/biosci\/pae\/marinebiology\/casestudies\/case_09.mhtml\">complex eyes<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cnidaria\/cubozoamm.html\">rapid, directed locomotion<\/a> (sometimes lunging up to 6 feet in a second to sting prey).<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s is a close-up of these <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cnidaria\/C_sivickisi.html\">multi-eyed predators<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cnidaria\/C_sivickisi.html\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.meehawl.com\/Asset\/Rhopalium.jpg\" alt=\"Rhopalium Box Jelly\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the mystery. The box jellies manage to use complex eyes (corneas, lenses, retinas), and directed hunting tactics, yet have no discernable brain or, indeed, a nervous column. They have a ring of nerve cells around their periphery and this seems to be sufficient to build models of their environment.<\/p>\n<p>And along the way, I did find out where Cameron got his idea for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0096754\/\"><span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Abyss<\/span> aliens<\/a>: the comb jellies, or <span style=\"font-style:italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ctenophora\">Ctenophora<\/a><\/span>. They are <a href=\"http:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/cemills\/Ctenophores.html\">free-swimming, aggressive predators<\/a>, with a curiously <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cnidaria\/ctenophora.html\">streamlined radial symmetry<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><IMG data-recalc-dims=\"1\" ALT=\"Red Line Bolinopsid -- 15cm\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.meehawl.com\/Asset\/RedLine1.jpg\"><br \/>\n<IMG data-recalc-dims=\"1\" ALT=\"Red Line Bolinopsid -- 15cm\"  src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.meehawl.com\/Asset\/RedLine2.jpg?w=272\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was thinking about the biological dogma that cephalisation can only occur within bilaterally symmetric animals (Bilateria). It seems to me that a bilateral symmetry would put evolutionary pressure on such animals to evolve&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.meehawl.com\/Blogfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}